{"id":260,"date":"2023-07-27T11:05:41","date_gmt":"2023-07-27T09:05:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/dapss\/inici\/"},"modified":"2024-03-05T10:48:51","modified_gmt":"2024-03-05T08:48:51","slug":"inici","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/dapss\/en\/","title":{"rendered":"Welcome"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Project PID2022-138413NB-I00<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Advances in our understanding of language acquisition have taken place in parallel to advances in the development of theoretical linguistics, with empirical coverage expanding in the 80s and 90s, and more sophisticated experimental techniques being developed in the\u00a0last twenty years. At this point, both the research on the biological foundations of language and the methods available to investigate child language acquisition make it possible to undertake issues that could not be addressed one decade ago. The aims of this project are\u00a0twofold: first, to consider infant and child grammar in under explored areas, all revolving around operators, with the methods now available\u00a0and, second, to reexamine the foundations of our understanding of development and acquisition in the light of ecological evolutionary\u00a0developmental biology.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The experimental studies proposed regard the development of syntax and semantics at a point when infants are still unable to produce\u00a0multiword sequences, but are nevertheless able to comprehend (to a still unknown extent) as revealed by eye-tracking techniques. The\u00a0research questions underlying the experiments proposed are: When do children establish the properties of the particular language they are\u00a0acquiring? Is the acquisition path homogeneous across languages? Are the parochial properties of different languages established much\u00a0earlier in the life of infants than previously thought? Pursuing our former work, we investigate experimentally the comprehension of\u00a0operators: wh-movement in wh-questions and logical operators. The experiments designed target infants from 17 months on; we aim to see if infants in that age range understand subject and object wh-questions in languages with overt wh-movement (Catalan, Palestinian Arabic) and languages with whin-situ (Chinese). By testing wh-questions with pseudo-verbs, a novelty of our method, we ensure that comprehension is not the result of a filler-gap strategy relying on knowledge of the argumental structure of the verb. For logical operators we have designed two experiments on the comprehension of all and some, and not all, which is mostly unexplored in infants. The developmental path of logical operators is of interest because previous work showed mixed results: on one hand, a long tradition of linguistic studies seemed to show that children semantic and pragmatic knowledge reach full development very late; on the other hand, a growing number of research lines in infancy suggest that some mastery of logical operations and inferential reasoning are available early on. The aim is to determine whether some and all, which are considered conceptual primitives, are mastered linguistically earlier than previously thought. Should the results be in line with those obtained by our and other teams (Zhu, Franck, Rizzi & Gavarr\u00f3 2022<\/a>, Perkins & Lidz 2021<\/a>), the timeline of the acquisition ofcore syntax and semantics would be underway by 16 to 17 months.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the domain of the foundations of linguistic inquiry, we reconsider the notion of Universal Grammar under new eco-devo avenues that reshape the relation between acquisition and its biological basis. The traditional understanding of language development, including Chomsky’s three factor model, is to be reinterpreted in such a way that causality is distributed among different factors (genome, epigenome, environmental influences, sensory stimulation, behavioural patterns), none of which is primary or determinant.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Team<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Research Team<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\"Anna<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Anna Gavarr\u00f3<\/a><\/strong>Investigadora Principalanna.gavarro[at]uab.cat<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Elena Pagliarini<\/a><\/strong>Investigadora Principalelena.pagliarini[at]uab.cat<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Sergio Balari<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

sergi.balari[at]uab.cat<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Working team \u2013 Acquisition & Pathology Lab (Bellaterra)<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Iman El-Hadef<\/strong>iman.elhadef[at]autonoma.cat<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Alejandra Keidel<\/strong>alejandra.keidel[at]uab.cat<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Tala Nazzal<\/strong>tala.nazzal[at]autonoma.cat<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Io Salmons Lluss\u00e0<\/strong>io.salmons[at]uab.cat<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Jin Yan<\/strong>jin.yan2[at]autonoma.cat<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Jingtao Zhu<\/strong>zjt19890109[at]163.com<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Working team \u2013 External<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Roman Feiman<\/strong>
Brown University roman_feiman[at]brown.edu<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Julie Franck<\/strong>
Universit\u00e9 de Gen\u00e8ve
julie.franck[at]unige.ch<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Maria Teresa Guasti<\/strong>
Universit\u00e0 degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca
mariateresa.guasti[at]unimib.it<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Jean-Remy Hochmann<\/strong>
CNRS \u2013 Institut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod hochmann[at]isc.cnrs.fr<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Shenai Hu<\/strong>
Xiamen University shenai.hu[at]xmu.edu.cn<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Jos\u00e9 Segovia Mart\u00edn<\/strong>
CNRS \u2013 Institut des Syst\u00e8mes Complexes Paris jisigmami[at]gmail.com<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n
UP<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Project PID2022-138413NB-I00 Advances in our understanding of language acquisition have taken place in parallel to advances in the development of theoretical linguistics, with empirical coverage expanding in the 80s and 90s, and more sophisticated experimental techniques being developed in the\u00a0last twenty years. At this point, both the research on the biological foundations of language and […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2765,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"sidebar.php","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-260","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/dapss\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/260","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/dapss\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/dapss\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/dapss\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2765"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/dapss\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=260"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/dapss\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/260\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":440,"href":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/dapss\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/260\/revisions\/440"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/dapss\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=260"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}