{"id":1166,"date":"2019-02-19T15:19:10","date_gmt":"2019-02-19T13:19:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/giq\/seminar\/quantum-biology-of-magnetoreception\/"},"modified":"2019-02-19T15:19:10","modified_gmt":"2019-02-19T13:19:10","slug":"quantum-biology-of-magnetoreception","status":"publish","type":"seminar","link":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/giq\/seminar\/quantum-biology-of-magnetoreception\/","title":{"rendered":"Quantum Biology of Magnetoreception"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Despite an established consensus that many forms of life can reliably detect the Earth&#8217;s weak magnetic field, it is unclear how many complex organisms sense it [1]. Most prominent mechanistic proposals invoke a quantum-biological model [2], relying on the assumption that an excitonic \u201cradical\u201d electron pair [3] facilitates magnetoreception of the Earth&#8217;s field (50 \u03bcT).<\/p>\n<p>Field-dependent decay products of this spin-crossing reaction are believed to constitute a decoherence channel to a signaling state that discriminates the field angle and inclination, yet essential details of the scheme are lacking. Comprehensive models of requisite activation [4-6], charge separation [7-8], chemical amplification [9-10], anisotropic response [11], coherence-preserving [12] and\/or decoherence-limiting [13] steps are needed. Given the rich complexity of the biological&nbsp;milieu&nbsp;and lacking a consistent&nbsp;in vitro&nbsp;model, mechanistic features must be identified empirically in order to confirm a viable magnetic sense receptor.<\/p>\n<p>In this seminar lecture, I review features of competing models of cryptochrome-based magnetoreception, in the context of existing theory and experiment. Seminar content will address recent conflicts [14-17] between evidences and conventional model proposals [18-19]. Implications of these conflicts will be explored in terms of an expanded model that involves the amplification of the spin-chemical effect\u2014with an eye toward broad generalization of existing principles [20-23]. We assess criticism of models reliant on quantum entanglement in a dynamic environment at physiological temperature [24-28]. If time permits, we will discuss overall challenges facing a broad class of reaction schemes that depend upon coherent singlet-triplet interconversion to enable magnetoreception. In closing, we will consider how the engineering of biosynthetic systems [29] could enable new technologies with ramifications for metrology [30], magnetogenetics [31], and medicine [32].<\/p>\n<p>Reference List:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>\n<p>Johnsen &amp; Lohmann, \u00abMagnetoreception in animals,\u00bb&nbsp;Physics Today&nbsp;61, 29-35 (2008).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Lambert&nbsp;et al., \u00abQuantum biology,\u00bb&nbsp;Nature Physics&nbsp;9, 10-18 (2013).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Rodgers &amp; Hore, \u201cChemical magnetoreception in birds: The radical pair mechanism,\u201d&nbsp;Proceedings of the National Academy&nbsp;of Sciences&nbsp;106, 353-360 (2009).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Nie\u00dfner, Denzau, Peichl, Wiltschko, &amp; Wiltschko, \u201cMagnetoreception: activation of avian cryptochrome 1a in various light&nbsp;conditions,\u201d&nbsp;Journal of Comparative Physiology A&nbsp;204, 977-984 (2018).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Ahmad, \u201cPhotocycle and signaling mechanisms of plant cryptochromes,\u201d&nbsp;Current Opinion in Plant Biology&nbsp;33, 108-115&nbsp;(2016).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Bouly&nbsp;et al., \u201cCryptochrome Blue Light Photoreceptors Are Activated through Interconversion of Flavin Redox States\u201d&nbsp;Journal of Biological Chemistry&nbsp;282, 9383\u20139391 (2007).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Firmino&nbsp;et al., \u201cQuantum effects in ultrafast electron transfers within cryptochromes,\u201d&nbsp;Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics&nbsp;18, 21442-21457 (2016).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Nohr, \u201cExtended Electron-Transfer in Animal Cryptochromes Mediated by a Tetrad of Aromatic Amino Acids,\u201d&nbsp;Biophysical Journal&nbsp;111, 301-311 (2016).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Kattnig&nbsp;et al., \u00abChemical amplification of magnetic field effects relevant to avian magnetoreception,\u00bb&nbsp;Nature Chemistry&nbsp;8, 384-391 (2016).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Kattnig &amp; Hore, \u201cThe sensitivity of a radical pair compass magnetoreceptor can be significantly amplified by radical scavengers,\u201d&nbsp;Scientific Reports&nbsp;7, 11640 (2017).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Hiscock&nbsp;et al., \u00abThe quantum needle of the avian magnetic compass,\u00bb&nbsp;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences113, 4634-4639.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Hiscock, \u201cLong-lived Spin Coherence in Radical Pair Compass Magnetoreception,\u201d PhD Thesis, University of Oxford (2018).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Kattnig, \u201cRadical-Pair-Based Magnetoreception Amplified by Radical Scavenging: Resilience to Spin Relaxation,\u201d&nbsp;Journal of&nbsp;Physical Chemistry B&nbsp;121, 10215\u201310227 (2017).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Pooam&nbsp;et al., \u201cMagnetic sensitivity mediated by the Arabidopsis blue\u2010light receptor cryptochrome occurs during flavin&nbsp;reoxidation in the dark,\u201d&nbsp;Planta&nbsp;249, 319-332 (2019).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Agliassa, Narayana, Christie, &amp; Maffei, \u201cGeomagnetic field impacts on cryptochrome and phytochrome signaling,\u201d Journal&nbsp;of Photochemistry &amp; Photobiology B,&nbsp;185&nbsp;32-40 (2018).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Wiltschko, Ahmad, Nie\u00dfner, Gehring, &amp; Wiltschko \u201cLight-dependent magnetoreception in birds: the crucial step occurs in&nbsp;the dark,\u201d&nbsp;Royal Society Interface&nbsp;13, 20151010 (2016).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>M\u00fcller &amp; Ahmad, \u201cLight-activated Cryptochrome Reacts with Molecular Oxygen to Form a Flavin\u2013Superoxide Radical Pair&nbsp;Consistent with Magnetoreception,\u201d&nbsp;Journal of Biological Chemistry&nbsp;286, 21033\u201321040 (2011).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Hore &amp; Mouritsen, \u201cThe Radical Pair Mechanism of Magnetoreception,\u201d&nbsp;Annual Review of Biophysics,&nbsp;45&nbsp;299-344 (2016).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Wiltschko &amp; Wiltschko, \u201cSensing Magnetic Directions in Birds: Radical Pair Processes Involving Cryptochrome,\u201d&nbsp;Biosensors&nbsp;4, 221-242 (2014).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Keens, Bedkihal, &amp; Kattnig, \u201cMagnetosensitivity in Dipolarly Coupled Three-Spin Systems,\u201d&nbsp;Physical Review Letters&nbsp;121,&nbsp;096001 (2018)<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Lindoy &amp; Manolopoulos, \u201cSimple and Accurate Method for Central Spin Problems,\u201d&nbsp;Physical Review Letters&nbsp;120, 220604&nbsp;(2018).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Lewis, Manolopoulos, &amp; Hore, \u201cAsymmetric recombination and electron spin relaxation in the semiclassical theory of&nbsp;radical pair reactions,\u201d&nbsp;Journal of Chemical Physics&nbsp;141, 044111 (2014).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Manolopoulos &amp; Hore, \u201cAn improved semiclassical theory of radical pair recombination reactions,\u201d&nbsp;Journal of Chemical&nbsp;Physics&nbsp;139, 124106 (2013).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Gauger &amp; Benjamin, \u201cComment on \u2018Quantum Coherence and Sensitivity of Avian Magnetoreception\u2019,\u201d&nbsp;Physical Review&nbsp;Letters&nbsp;110, 178901 (2013).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Pauls, Zhang, Berman, &amp; Kais, \u201cQuantum coherence and entanglement in the avian compass,\u201d&nbsp;Physical Review E&nbsp;97,&nbsp;062704 (2013).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Hogben, Biskup, &amp; Hore, \u00abEntanglement and Sources of Magnetic Anisotropy in Radical Pair-Based Avian&nbsp;Magnetoreceptors,\u00bb&nbsp;Physical Review Letters&nbsp;109, 220501 (2012).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Bandyopadhyay, Paterek, Kaszlikowski, \u201cQuantum Coherence and Sensitivity of Avian Magnetoreception,\u201d&nbsp;Physical Review&nbsp;Letters 109,&nbsp;110502 (2012).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Mendive-Tapia&nbsp;et al., \u201cMultidimensional Quantum Mechanical Modeling of Electron Transfer and Electronic Coherence in&nbsp;Plant Cryptochromes: The Role of Initial Bath Conditions,\u201d Journal of Physical Chemistry B&nbsp;122, 126\u2212136 (2017).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Bialas&nbsp;et al., \u00abEngineering an Artificial Flavoprotein Magnetosensor,\u00bb&nbsp;Journal of the American Chemical Society&nbsp;138, 16584-16587 (2016).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Imamoglu &amp; Whaley, \u201cPhotoactivated biological processes as quantum measurements,\u201d&nbsp;Physical Review E&nbsp;91, 022714&nbsp;(2015).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Meister, \u201cPhysical limits to magnetogenetics,\u201d&nbsp;eLife&nbsp;5, e17210 (2016).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Juutilainen, Herrala, Luukkonen, Naarala, &amp; Hore, \u201cMagnetocarcinogenesis: is there a mechanism for carcinogenic effects&nbsp;of weak magnetic fields?\u201d&nbsp;Proceedings of the Royal Society B&nbsp;285, 20180590 (2018).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Despite an established consensus that many forms of life can reliably detect the Earth&#8217;s weak magnetic field, it is unclear how many complex organisms sense it [1]. Most prominent mechanistic proposals invoke a quantum-biological model [2], relying on the assumption that an excitonic \u201cradical\u201d electron pair [3] facilitates magnetoreception of the Earth&#8217;s field (50 \u03bcT). [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":20,"featured_media":0,"template":"","class_list":["post-1166","seminar","type-seminar","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/giq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/seminar\/1166","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/giq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/seminar"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/giq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/seminar"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/giq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/20"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/giq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1166"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}