{"id":902,"date":"2011-02-07T15:51:04","date_gmt":"2011-02-07T13:51:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/giq\/seminar\/all-versus-nothing-proofs-n-qubits-distributed-between-m-parties\/"},"modified":"2011-02-07T15:51:04","modified_gmt":"2011-02-07T13:51:04","slug":"all-versus-nothing-proofs-n-qubits-distributed-between-m-parties","status":"publish","type":"seminar","link":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/giq\/seminar\/all-versus-nothing-proofs-n-qubits-distributed-between-m-parties\/","title":{"rendered":"All-versus-nothing proofs with n qubits distributed between m parties"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>All-versus-nothing (AVN) proofs [1&#8211;6] show the conflict between Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen&#8217;s (EPR) elements of reality [7] and the perfect correlations of some quantum states. The name of &#8220;all-versus-nothing&#8221; [8] reflects a particular feature of these proofs: If one consider a set of perfect correlations and asumes EPR elements of reality, then a subset of these correlations leads to a conclusion that is opposite of the one obtained from the complementary subset of correlations.<\/p>\n<p>The perfect correlations among single qubit measurements required for AVN proofs are given by the 2n stabilizer operators of an n-qubit graph state. The possibility of experimentally preparing new classes of graph states [9&#8211;11] naturally leads to the following problem: Does a distribution of an n-qubit graph state between m parties allow an AVN proof? This problem has been solved for m = 2 [12]. Here we describe a method to decide whether a given n-qubit m-particle graph state allows an m-partite AVN proof specific for this state (i.e., which cannot be obtained using a graph state with fewer qubits) [13]. This method requires that two observables of each qubit are EPR elements of reality. This forces a series of constraints that are only satisfied by a reduced group of the graph state&#8217;s stabilizer operators. We detail these requirements and apply them to decide whether some n-qubit m-particle graph states recently prepared in the laboratory [9&#8211;11] allow m-partite AVN proofs.<\/p>\n<p>We also address the following problem: Given an n-qubit graph state, what is the minimum number m of parties that allows a specific m-partite AVN proof? The solution of this problem enables us to obtain all inequivalent distributions allowing AVN proofs with n &lt; 9 qubits and an arbitrary number m of parties [13].<\/p>\n<p>These results provide the tools to help experimentalists to design tests of new AVN proofs and new Bell inequalities based on these proofs [14].<\/p>\n<p>[1] P. Heywood and M. L. G. Redhead, Found. Phys. 13, 481 (1983).<br \/>[2] D. M. Greenberger, M. A. Horne, and A. Zeilinger, in Bells Theorem, Quantum Theory, and Conceptions of the Universe, edited by M. Kafatos (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1989), p. 69.<br \/>[3] D. M. Greenberger, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and A. Zeilinger, Am. J. Phys. 58, 1131 (1990).<br \/>[4] A. Cabello, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1911 (2001).<br \/>[5] A. Cabello, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 010403 (2001).<br \/>[6] A. Cabello, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 210401 (2005).<br \/>[7] A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).<br \/>[8] N. D. Mermin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1838 (1990).<br \/>[9] R. Ceccarelli, G. Vallone, F. De Martini, P. Mataloni, and A. Cabello, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 160401 (2009).<br \/>[10] W.-B. Gao, X.-C. Yao, P. Xu, O. G\u00fchne, A. Cabello, C.-Y. Lu, C.-Z. Peng, T. Yang, Z.-B. Chen, and J.-W. Pan, arXiv:0906.3390 (2009).<br \/>[11] W.-B. Gao, C.-Y. Lu, X.-C. Yao, P. Xu, O. G\u00fchne, A. Goebel, Y.-A. Chen, C.-Z. Peng, Z.-B. Chen, and J.-W. Pan, Nat. Phys. 6, 331 (2010).<br \/>[12] A. Cabello and P. Moreno, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 220402 (2007).<br \/>[13] A. Cabello and P. Moreno, Phys. Rev. A 81, 042110 (2010).<br \/>[14] A. Cabello, O. G\u00fchne, and D. Rodr\u00edguez, Phys. Rev. A 77, 062106 (2008).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>All-versus-nothing (AVN) proofs [1&#8211;6] show the conflict between Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen&#8217;s (EPR) elements of reality [7] and the perfect correlations of some quantum states. The name of &#8220;all-versus-nothing&#8221; [8] reflects a particular feature of these proofs: If one consider a set of perfect correlations and asumes EPR elements of reality, then a subset of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":20,"featured_media":0,"template":"","class_list":["post-902","seminar","type-seminar","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/giq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/seminar\/902","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/giq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/seminar"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/giq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/seminar"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/giq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/20"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/giq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=902"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}