{"id":1,"date":"2026-01-27T16:37:10","date_gmt":"2026-01-27T14:37:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/renaissance-antiquarianism\/?p=1"},"modified":"2026-01-27T18:14:08","modified_gmt":"2026-01-27T16:14:08","slug":"accursio-lias","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/renaissance-antiquarianism\/2026\/01\/27\/accursio-lias\/","title":{"rendered":"New article on Mariangelo Accursio and the Epigrammata antiquae urbis"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-8f761849 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:33.33%\">\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"683\" height=\"1024\" src=\"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/renaissance-antiquarianism\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/698\/2026\/01\/lias-1-683x1024.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-29\" srcset=\"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/renaissance-antiquarianism\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/698\/2026\/01\/lias-1-683x1024.jpg 683w, https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/renaissance-antiquarianism\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/698\/2026\/01\/lias-1-200x300.jpg 200w, https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/renaissance-antiquarianism\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/698\/2026\/01\/lias-1-768x1151.jpg 768w, https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/renaissance-antiquarianism\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/698\/2026\/01\/lias-1.jpg 1000w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 683px) 100vw, 683px\" \/><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:66.66%\">\n<p>In a recently published article in <em><strong>Lias. Journal of Early Modern Intellectual Culture and its Sources<\/strong>, \u00a0<\/em>G. Gonz\u00e1lez Germain examines a series of copies of the <em>Epigrammata antiquae urbis<\/em> (Rome, 1521) with the same set of annotations by <strong>Antonio Lelli<\/strong>, <strong>Giovenale Manetti<\/strong>, and other humanists. By so doing, he definitively identifies the <strong>author of these notes<\/strong> as the humanist <strong>Mariangelo Accursio<\/strong> (1489\u20131546), who also prepared the errata list of the book. The article illuminates Accursio\u2019s study of ancient epigraphy both in Rome (1517\u20131521) and during his stay in Augsburg (1532\u20131533).<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p><b>DOI:\u00a0<\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/poj.peeters-leuven.be\/content.php?url=article&amp;id=3294627&amp;journal_code=LIAS\">10.2143\/LIAS.50.2.3294627<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-8f761849 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:100%\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In a recently published article in Lias. Journal of Early Modern Intellectual Culture and its Sources, \u00a0G. Gonz\u00e1lez Germain examines a series of copies of the Epigrammata antiquae urbis (Rome, 1521) with the same set of annotations by Antonio Lelli, Giovenale Manetti, and other humanists. By so doing, he definitively identifies the author of these [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3161,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-new-publications"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/renaissance-antiquarianism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/renaissance-antiquarianism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/renaissance-antiquarianism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/renaissance-antiquarianism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3161"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/renaissance-antiquarianism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/renaissance-antiquarianism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":32,"href":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/renaissance-antiquarianism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1\/revisions\/32"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/renaissance-antiquarianism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/renaissance-antiquarianism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/renaissance-antiquarianism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}