{"id":1680,"date":"2020-03-03T16:49:01","date_gmt":"2020-03-03T14:49:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.uab.cat\/saramartinalegre\/?p=1680"},"modified":"2020-03-03T16:49:01","modified_gmt":"2020-03-03T14:49:01","slug":"how-entitlement-and-villainy-connect-as-i-explain-in-masculinity-and-patriarchal-villainy-from-hitler-to-voldemort","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/saramartinalegre\/2020\/03\/03\/how-entitlement-and-villainy-connect-as-i-explain-in-masculinity-and-patriarchal-villainy-from-hitler-to-voldemort\/","title":{"rendered":"<strong>HOW ENTITLEMENT AND VILLAINY CONNECT (AS I EXPLAIN IN <em>MASCULINITY AND PATRIARCHAL VILLAINY: FROM HITLER TO VOLDEMORT<\/em>)<\/strong>"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\tI have been delaying this post in the hopes that some of our local Spanish universities would have bought by now the monograph I published back in November 2019, <em>Masculinity and Patriarchal Villainy: From Hitler to Voldemort <\/em>(Routledge, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.routledge.com\/Masculinity-and-Patriarchal-Villainy-in-the-British-Novel-From-Hitler\/Martin\/p\/book\/9780367441463\">https:\/\/www.routledge.com\/Masculinity-and-Patriarchal-Villainy-in-the-British-Novel-From-Hitler\/Martin\/p\/book\/9780367441463<\/a>). This has not happened yet, though you can check here where the volume is available near you (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.worldcat.org\/title\/masculinity-and-patriarchal-villainy-in-the-british-novel-from-hitler-to-voldemort\/oclc\/1140353245&amp;referer=brief_results\">https:\/\/www.worldcat.org\/title\/masculinity-and-patriarchal-villainy-in-the-british-novel-from-hitler-to-voldemort\/oclc\/1140353245&amp;referer=brief_results<\/a>). I\u2019m told there the paperback edition will be published next year, when I\u2019ll continue my own personal marketing campaign, of which this is post is, unashamedly, an item.<\/p>\n<p>\tIt is hard to say how long it has taken me to write this book because the idea first occurred to me back in 2008 (I spent a sabbatical then gathering bibliography), but technically the book expands on a chapter in my doctoral dissertation (submitted in 1996). Since 2006-7 I had been teaching the seminar (in Spanish) \u201cRepresentations of Heroism\u201d within the Cultural Studies module of the MA in Literatura Comparada: Estudios Literarios y Culturales of my university. I taught the last edition in 2016-17, so you can say that the book, which connects with my discourse on villainy for this seminar, was started back in 2006 and has taken thirteen years to be written. That might be the case, though the actual writing, from contract to publication, took about twenty months. If I have managed the feat of producing a monograph this is only because my teaching workload is now lower (thanks to the Government decree of 2012 by Minister Wert which few universities are applying), and because my Department allowed me to organize my teaching so that I could spend a complete year on the book (apart from tutorials for BA, MA, and PhD dissertations). I am already at work on another book, but I\u2019m not sure at all that this window of opportunity will ever present itself again, considering that it has taken more than twenty-five years of my career for the past one to materialize.<\/p>\n<p>\tAnother reason why it has taken me long to write this book is that, once I hit on the idea that my topic should be villainy and not heroism (on which far more has been written), I had basically the whole field to myself. Believe it or not, there is very little direct bibliography on villainy, and what is available deals mainly with specific villains and not with the concept itself. Typically, I started with lists of villainous characters and soon got mired into what promised to be the beginnings of an encyclopedia. That was not, however, the kind of book I wanted to write. Nor a history of fictional villainy, though now that I\u2019m done writing my own book this is a project that I wish someone else would write (not me!). The problem of how to select a corpus and structure a coherent volume plagued me for years \u2013as I kept myself busy doing a thousand other things\u2013 until I ask my previous PhD supervisor, Andrew Monnickendam, for help. His advice was very simple but very helpful: narrow down the field to a genre, a period, and a nationality. Since most bibliography on villainy deals with recent American audio-visual products, here was the solution to my needs: I would focus on the British novel since WWII.<\/p>\n<p>\tWhy? Reason number one: the fictional construction of villainy is rooted in British culture, beginning with the Devil and Vice in the morality plays, following with Shakespeare, Milton, the Gothic novel, Dickens\u2026 Should I go on? The villain is, most definitely, not a product of American culture. Reason number two: the villain\u2019s audiovisual presence often depends on novels that have been ignored or that, even when they are very popular, are seen as vehicles for the hero. I wanted to put together a variety of cases that would help me stress a crucial point: there is a remarkable coherence in the presentation of villainy across different fiction genres; this has been overlooked simply because no one was paying attention. Third reason: Adolf Hitler had to be in my book as the real-life villain that changed the rules of representing villainy. I knew from the very beginning that my book should be called <em>From Hitler to Voldemort<\/em>, though Routledge preferred the title to act as subtitle, and have the volume be called <em>Masculinity and Patriarchal Villainy in British Fiction<\/em>, which was originally my subtitle.<\/p>\n<p>\tHere is the table of contents:<br \/>\nIntroduction. Defining the Patriarchal Villain<br \/>\nChapter 1. Adolf Hitler: The Threat of Absolute Villainy<br \/>\nChapter 2. Big Brother and O\u2019Brien: The Mystique of Power and the Reproduction of Patriarchal Masculinity<br \/>\nChapter 3. Morgoth and Sauron: The Problem of Recurring Villainy<br \/>\nChapter 4. Steerpike: Gormenghast\u2019s Angry Young Man<br \/>\nChapter 5. Ernst Stavro Blofeld, Larger Than Life: The Villain in the James Bond Series<br \/>\nChapter 6. Richard Onslow Roper and the \u2018Labyrinth of Monstrosities\u2019: John le Carr\u00e9\u2019s Post-Cold War Villains<br \/>\nChapter 7. Michael Dobbs\u2019s Francis Urquhart Trilogy: Democracy at Risk<br \/>\nChapter 8. Big Ger Cafferty, Crime Boss: The Constant Struggle to Retain Power<br \/>\nChapter 9. Voldemort and the Limits of Dark Magic: Self-empowerment as Self-destruction<\/p>\n<p>\tThis is quite similar to the list I started with, although Chapter 4 was originally split between Mervyn Peake, Grahame Green (<em>Brighton Rock<\/em>), and Anthony Burgess (<em>A Clockwork Orange<\/em>). I soon realized that Peake\u2019s Steerpike demanded more room and I gave it to him. As you can see, some chapters deal with very well-known texts, others not so much (Chapter 7 is the first academic essay on the Urquhart novels by Michael Dobbs). One thing that bothered me is that the list of primary sources for each chapter ran from just one book (Orwell\u2019s <em>1984<\/em> in Chapter 2) to twelve (Ian Fleming\u2019s Bond novels in Chapter 5) and even more (Ian Rankin\u2019s many novels in Chapter 8). I discovered, though, that the strict word-count which I had to respect (110000 words), helped me to stay focused. Of all the villains here considered, I was most surprised by Tolkien\u2019s Morgoth, a relatively little known character because he appears in the pages of <em>The Silmarillion<\/em>, not an easy book to read. If you\u2019re wondering who Morgoth is you need to know that he is Sauron\u2019s much admired master.<\/p>\n<p>\tHow did I tackle Hitler\u2019s immense figure, you may be wondering? A turning point in my research was Ian Kershaw\u2019s two-volume biography, <em>Hitler, 1889-1936: Hubris<\/em> (1997) and <em>Hitler: 1936-1945 Nemesis<\/em> (2000). Kershaw, an English political historian, discusses Hitler\u2019s rise and fall in relation to how the mechanism of power operates and why German society failed to control his crazed tyranny. Kershaw rejects evil and psychopathology as explanations for Hitler\u2019s personality, and that was what I needed. I added to Kershaw\u2019s interest in power my own interest in gender, and I developed thus my main thesis, namely, that villainy is the expression of the patriarchal sense of entitlement to power in its highest degree. For me, Hitler is not exceptional as a man who believes himself entitled to power in the patriarchal context of his own society, but rather a representative of a type of masculinity we now call toxic but should simply be called patriarchal. What was exceptional in his case, as Kershaw explains, is that all the mechanisms to stop Hitler\u2019s excessive entitlement failed. The hero, I argue, personifies those mechanisms but in Hitler\u2019s case there could be no German hero since he had presented himself as such. The Allies had to play that role but they did so among so many tensions that WWII was soon followed by the Cold War.<\/p>\n<p>\tMy theory of power is, unlike Kershaw\u2019s, gendered but despite my focus on the patriarchal masculinity of the villains I have studied, I believe that entitlement is a negative quality present in both men and women with patriarchal inclinations. That is to say, although patriarchy has so far accumulated most power and deployed a series of strategies to keep non-white, non-heterosexual, non-upper-class men and all women subordinated, patriarchy is so attached to notions of power that as those excluded from power rebel (= empower themselves) it may welcome them in its patriarchal hegemonic circles. This is why, as I have written here before, I find the notion of empowerment very suspect. I decided not to deal in my book with female villains because to really understand villainy in women you need to find them in a post-gender context \u2013while I wrote the book, then, I produced a chapter on Alma Coin, the female villain of <em>The Hunger Games<\/em>, for a book on the Final Girl. Women, my claim is, may feel a strong sense of entitlement to power, too, but so far this has been denied by patriarchy. If, however, patriarchy becomes less gender-obsessed while still retaining its obsession with power, we might see a female Hitler one day.<\/p>\n<p>\tAt this point, though, I have made it my mission to offer an anti-fascist diagnosis of what makes patriarchal men tick, claiming in the process that we urgently need positive representations of men as alternatives to patriarchy (see my previous post). It has been inevitable, logically, to speak of the heroes in connection to the villains but what I have found out is mostly depressing. The heroes offered by the British authors I have selected are mostly weak and disempowered \u2013often crushed by the loss of male honourability\u2013 or plain nasty. I was surprised by how deeply Ian Fleming disliked his James Bond and dismayed by how fond Mervyn Peake was of Titus Groan, to me a young man on the verge of either worshipping or becoming someone like Hitler. My authors are all white and male because I wanted to see, precisely, how they deal with the tale of the hero and the villain, which is so central to hegemonic patriarchal culture. The only woman I chose, though, J.K. Rowling, provides, as I have been arguing again and again, the best possible model of anti-patriarchal heroic masculinity (borrowing from Tolkien\u2019s Frodo). Harry Potter, however, seems to be too good for our macho-oriented times.<\/p>\n<p>\tThroughout the writing of the book and afterwards I have been daily testing my thesis that what we call evil is actually entitlement based on a patriarchal understanding of power. Evil, in my view, is an interested patriarchal construction designed to mystify us about the operations of entitlement. Let me explain myself. Hitler acted as he did because he felt himself entitled to taking other European lands for the expansion of the German people, and to eliminating other European bodies that (for prejudices widespread at the time) he abhorred. He went further than any other villain (except for Joseph Stalin, of course) but you could say that all of human life is organized on the principle of how we express our own sense of entitlement depending on the power we wield and our disregard of punishment. From colonial occupation down to leaving your motorbike parked in the middle of the pavement everything is a matter of entitlement. Our own sense of personal privilege, our belief that we can do as we wish because we can (= we have the power) overcomes all sense of solidarity with the rest of the species. You might think that there is an enormous difference between bothering pedestrians and killing six million Jews (and many other persons) but this is a matter of degree (I\u2019m NOT being flippant). Let your child\u2019s sense of entitlement go uncurbed and you have a potential fascist in your hands. The rest is a matter of opportunities (the many Hitler had), befuddling your enemies (as he did with his impressive PR Nazi apparatus), and acting fast (while the victims considered appeasement policies that would never appease).<\/p>\n<p>\tSo, if the premise of my book works well readers will stop seeing patriarchy as a mechanism for women\u2019s repression (it\u2019s a hierarchical social structure based on power), and will deny the existence of evil (what matters is entitlement). Readers will also see female villainnesses, specially <em>femme fatales<\/em>, as the pathetic creatures they are, with their ultra-sexualised bodies, and will perceive how the villain\u2019s masculinity is shaped by patriarchal doctrines. The way I see it, the hero has been invented by patriarchy to solve one of its main weaknesses: if you structure society on the basis of power, sooner or later an individual will claim too large a share, and this will endanger the other powerful individuals. The hero acts out, therefore, on behalf of patriarchy, to limit its excesses but not at all to challenge its hierarchy-oriented, pyramidal construction. <\/p>\n<p>\tI ended the book with a plea that one day we find other stories to tell, in which there are no heroes because the power-hungry patriarchal villains are gone. I have no idea what these stories might be, or whether they will be exciting at all, but we really need to see beyond power, abuse, and suffering and think of new plots \u2013 for the sake of our survival as a species.<\/p>\n<p><strong>I publish a post once a week (follow @SaraMartinUAB). Comments are very welcome! Download the yearly volumes from: http:\/\/ddd.uab.cat\/record\/116328. My web: http:\/\/gent.uab.cat\/saramartinalegre\/<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I have been delaying this post in the hopes that some of our local Spanish universities would have bought by now the monograph I published back in November 2019, Masculinity and Patriarchal Villainy: From Hitler to Voldemort (Routledge, https:\/\/www.routledge.com\/Masculinity-and-Patriarchal-Villainy-in-the-British-Novel-From-Hitler\/Martin\/p\/book\/9780367441463). This has not happened yet, though you can check here where the volume is available near [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":98,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,21],"tags":[199,212,235,320,360,408,510],"class_list":["post-1680","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cultural-studies","category-harry-potter","tag-feminism","tag-gender-studies","tag-heroism","tag-masculinity","tag-patriarchy","tag-research","tag-villainy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/saramartinalegre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1680","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/saramartinalegre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/saramartinalegre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/saramartinalegre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/98"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/saramartinalegre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1680"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/saramartinalegre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1680\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/saramartinalegre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1680"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/saramartinalegre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1680"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webs.uab.cat\/saramartinalegre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1680"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}